Contact Us

All Things CNN is an independent blog that has no affiliation with CNN.

If you wish to contact us with tips, comments or suggestions our email is

To contact a specific CNN program please check our CNN programs link at the top of this page.

To contact CNN
click here.


All Things CNN
is now on Twitter.
twitter / AllThingsCNN

Monday, October 15, 2012

Can a new CEO save CNN?

From yesterday's USA TODAY:

Can A New CEO Save CNN?
 by Michael Wolff 

CNN, the news network that nobody likes, or watches or can fix, is looking for a new CEO.
Even if you actually believed you could fix it, it's far from clear that anybody would want you to. Although the network is an embarrassment to everybody who works there, as well as to the industry as a whole, it still, confoundedly, makes tons of money — in part because it is so unfocused and ineffectual.
It's the dim and pointless yin to MSNBC and Fox, the sharp and pointed yang. CNN is every cable system's beard. You couldn't have the rancorous networks people really watch without the cover of the middle-of-the-road pallid one whose ratings sink ever further.
So the main job for the new CNN CEO may be just to bear the humiliation of it all.
There are quite a lot of people who would undoubtedly do that job. Television people, after all, need television jobs.
In the permanent class of contenders, you have David Westin, the former head of ABC News; Andrew Heyward, the former head of CBS News; Neal Shapiro, the former head of NBC News; and, most notably, Jeff Zucker, the former head of NBC Entertainment who went on to run the whole network, before Comcast, NBC's new owner, fired him.
Other candidates include the people currently in these jobs, who fear losing them — and who are more likely to keep them if someone else tries to hire them.
The first thing that is obviously wrong with each of these gentlemen is that they are network television guys and not cable guys. One critique about CNN is that, while it is a cable network, what it really wants to do is news the way networks used to do it. It yearns for a kind of virtuous respectability that no longer seems to exist.
It probably isn't just happenstance that CNN exists within the same company that produces News Night on HBO, a fictional news show that does not seem to know the difference between cable news and network news. Indeed, after News Night banned any mention of the Casey Anthony murder trial in one of its story lines as too louche for good people, so did CNN.
Of the network news execs, Zucker is the superstar favorite for the job — not least of all because he tells everyone he is. Phil Griffin, the head of MSNBC, who says he, too, has been approached about the CNN job, also says that the hypercompetitive Zucker is the only potential CNN chief he'd be afraid of.
On the other hand, the hypercompetitive and high-profile Zucker would have to pass muster with the low-key and low-profile Phil Kent, who is CEO of Turner Broadcasting, under whose umbrella, CNN — for historic if not logical reasons — falls. And Zucker and Kent seem like Mutt and, well, Jeff.
Zucker would also have to get by Jeff Bewkes, the CEO of Time Warner, CNN's ultimate owner, whose job, everybody knows, Zucker wants.
Inside CNN, there is managing editor Mark Whitaker, the former editor of Newsweek, who has been trying to reinvent himself in television. Whitaker is the earnest news choice, but Time Warner tried this once before, when it gave Walter Isaacson, the former editor of Time, the top CNN job, with mostly unhappy results. (Also, Whitaker has gotten most of the blame for CNN rushing to be the first to air the Supreme Court's Obama heath care ruling — and getting it all wrong.)
Then there is cable television. Among cable's leading executives, there's Nancy Dubuc of the History Channel, who took a faded programming concept (Nazi reruns), which is pretty much CNN's lot, and gave it a new look (reality programming). Indeed, there are a lot of women in the upward ranks of television, all who have the advantage of not being the same old men.
And then there's a digital hire. CNN might wisely prepare itself for when news leaves television altogether for desktop, laptop and mobile devices.
Except that people in television don't really know people in digital, other than Arianna Huffington, who actually might take the job.
But here's the thing: Everybody knows what makes a cable news station work — the opposite kind of person from the one Time Warner would ever hire.
CNN stands between two competitors that succeed at the expense of CNN — Fox News and MSNBC. That's because they were created by two outsized and pretty much uncontrollable personalities.
Roger Ailes, at Fox, is television news' most powerful voice and greatest talent. Keith Olbermann, who effectively ran MSNBC, is television's most peculiar and irascible voice. (Even though Olbermann was finally fired at MSNBC, the network is still his programming vision.)
So in the end, even after much gnashing of teeth, this is how they'll look at it:
Sure, people make fun of CNN, but it makes money, doesn't it? So all we really have is a PR problem.
In that case, there is Gary Ginsberg, Time Warner's vaunted PR chief, formerly Rupert Murdoch's consigliere, who has long wanted to leave the corporate office and run an operating company. Ginsberg isn't a television guy. He's a brilliant and powerful corporate smoother and handler.
That's how you manage the unmanageable.
Life is just too short to remake cable news.

All content, unless otherwise cited, is © All Things CNN and may not be used without consent of the blog administrator.


Anonymous said...

So, I guess this is final stage of mourning for CNN. Just resign to the fact that you suck and make as much money as you can, while you can. No wonder they are started to be known as the Corporate News Network - the best news money can buy.

I guess we are just going to have to wait for the ABC/Univision merger cable news channel to get a real news channel. I wish them the best of luck.

Anonymous said...

When CNN starts to lose money, they will revamp.
Until than things will stay as status quo.
Money is the only language everyone understands, even David Ginsberg.

Anonymous said...

Corporate News Network is certainly correct.

When a channel does a week of pro-government reports for countries with human rights records like Ukraine and Nigeria - any journalistic or ethical standard is pretty much gone.

It has been said on this site before - the whole middle management of Parisa Khosravi, Ellana Lee, Katherine Green, Ken Jautz, Mark Whitaker and Tony Maddox need to be fired.

Anonymous said...

@6:40AM ---- I second that.

BUH-bye Parisa !!!

Anonymous said...

So, basically the whole article is just an ad for Gary Ginsberg?

I wonder how much he paid the author?

Anonymous said...

@10:31AM, if this is a paid endorsement of Ginsberg, can you imagine that amount of bank Zucker is dropping to keep his name at the top of the list to replace Walton? Zucker is a little weasel. I bet Erin Burnett is creaming herself over the prospect of Zucker coming to CNN to save her career. She would pitch in a few bucks to make that happen. As for AC, I think he would jump ship if Zucker got the gig. Piers is another one who is probably begging to report to Zucker - Piers has some high friends at NBC.

Anonymous said...

Walton never really did much at CNN. He was pretty hands off.

He allowed problems to fester, situations to go from bad worse, and terrible, malicious, manipulative middle management to grow and fester like dry rot.

The guy himself didn't cause problems - he was just asleep at the wheel.

Now - which of these candidates: Zucker, Ginsberg, Stringer etc is most likely to tear out the bad decision-making of CNN's lousy delusional vice-presidents who make poor TV every day ?

That guy gets my vote.